Leveraging an Electron-Acceptor Engineering Strategy to Regulate Excitation Dynamics of Dyes for Devising Ideal Phototherapeutic Agents in Synergistic Photodynamic/Mild-Photothermal Tumor Therapy
Despite the individual merits of photodynamic or photothermal therapy (PTT) for clinical
cancer treatment, the inherent shortcomings of single-modal therapy significantly
hinder therapeutic outcomes in tumors. Therefore, integrating multimodal therapeutic
functions into a smart dye can address the drawbacks of single-modal therapy, albeit
with significant challenges. By employing an electron-acceptor engineering strategy
to regulate the excitation dynamics processes of dyes, we designed a series of near-infrared
(NIR) dyes (
Introduction
Cancer, a challenging disease that has seriously harmed humanity for many years, and its diagnosis and treatment have always been a hot research area. Photon-driven therapy utilizing organic dyes, in contrast to conventional treatments such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery, offers a promising alternative with minimal toxicity to normal tissues and precise spatiotemporal control. This innovative approach has opened new avenues for cancer treatment.1–3 For example, indocyanine green (ICG), an Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved dye, has shown potential in both diagnosing and treating tumors in clinical settings or trials, highlighting its versatility in biomedical applications. However, limitations such as low photostability and inefficient generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) may hinder the efficacy of ICG-based photon-driven therapy for tumor treatment. Consequently, researchers are committed to developing robust phototherapy systems to overcome these challenges and advance the diagnosis and treatment of tumors.
Fluorescence imaging (FLI) is a common optically based diagnostic method that has advantages of sensitive response and precise spatiotemporal control. However, in practical scenarios, the limited penetration depth of FLI significantly hinders imaging resolution and accuracy due to variations in light absorption and scattering by tissues.4–6 Fortunately, photoacoustic imaging (PAI) partially overcomes this limitation by providing higher spatial resolution. PAI, a crucial clinical imaging technology, involves the absorption of light by molecules, leading to thermal elastic expansion and nonradiative conversion of electromagnetic energy into mechanical energy to generate mechanical waves. Subsequently, an ultrasonic transducer detects the signal to create an observable image, enabling deeper tissue imaging.7,8 Consequently, PAI has broader prospects in clinical applications.
Phototheranotics, which include photodynamic therapy (PDT) and photothermal therapy (PTT), are recognized as effective methods for treating tumors due to their precise and controllable spatiotemporal selectivity, lack of resistance, and noninvasiveness.9,10 In PDT, upon exposure to light of a specific wavelength, the excited photosensitizer (*PS) can generate ROS through energy or electron transfer pathways, leading to direct ablation of tumor cells by damaging biological macromolecules.11,12 Despite the advantages of high spatial-temporal accuracy and minimal invasiveness of PDT in trials, the therapeutic efficacy of the PS depends on the O2 content in the tumor microenvironments to a large extent. Unfortunately, the hypoxic microenvironments in solid tumor tissues are not conducive to the therapeutic outcomes of PDT.13,14 In PTT, a photothermal agent absorbs photon energy at a specific wavelength, transitions to an excited state, and then releases energy through nonradiative pathways, thereby increasing the temperature of the tumor environment to denature intracellular proteins or destroy the plasma membrane for tumor ablation. Unlike PDT, PTT is not limited by the O2 concentration in the tumor environment.15,16 Furthermore, the heat generated during PTT can facilitate photothermal imaging (PTI) using a thermal imaging system, enabling real-time monitoring of the treatment process.17 However, traditional PTT may cause nonspecific heat damage to normal tissues surrounding the illuminated area due to high light power density or excessive heat production. Additionally, the upregulation of heat shock proteins in tumor cells in response to heat stress can limit the efficacy of PTT to a certain extent.18,19 Therefore, the limitations of the single-modal strategy of treatment in clinical settings, as described above, often result in unsatisfactory therapeutic outcomes. Combining the multimodal therapeutic functions and imaging advantages of various modalities in a smart dye offers a promising strategy to address these shortcomings. By integrating the benefits of PDT and PTT, this approach can enhance the treatment efficacy. On the one hand, PTT can increase the tissue temperature within the treatment area, thus expanding blood vessels, increasing blood flow, and enhancing tissue oxygenation to boost ROS production by the PS during PDT. Simultaneously, PDT can eliminate the incomplete ablation of tumor cells due to the heat shock effect during PTT.20–23 The synergistic effects of PDT and PTT eliminate the need for high-power laser irradiation to ensure PTT effectiveness or the maintenance of high temperatures (≥50 °C) during treatment, which can damage normal tissues. This approach also prevents the incomplete killing of cancer cells and tumor recurrence in deep tissues caused by low treatment temperatures (≤45 °C) in mild-photothermal therapy (MPTT).24–27
Therefore, the abovementioned requirements inspired us to design smart phototherapeutic
dyes with multimodal diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities, which posed significant
challenges. According to the Jablonski diagram, first, after absorbing photon energy
from the ground state (S0) to the excited state (*S1), the dye molecule can dissipate energy through a nonradiative pathway, enabling
PTT, PTI, and PAI. Second, in the *T1 state, the dye can convert O2 into ROS via energy or electron transfer pathways, endowing the molecule with the
PDT capabilities. However, these two processes often compete, leading to dyes exhibiting
predominantly only one property. Hence, it is crucial to optimize dye structures to
strike a balance that allows for both effective PTT, PTI, and PAI and PDT functionalities.21,22 In addition, most of the developed organic PSs/photothermal agents tend to aggregate
in aqueous solutions due to poor solubility, significantly reducing their imaging
and therapeutic efficacy because of reducing the fluorescence quantum yield and ROS
yield of dyes.28–30 Conversely, dyes exhibiting aggregation-induced emission (AIE) characteristics demonstrate
enhanced performance in the aggregated state. For example, the AIE effect significantly
influences the ROS generation of PSs.31–34 Despite numerous molecules with AIE properties being identified for tumor ablation
primarily through single-modal PDT or PTT, dyes with optimal synergistic functions
and multimodal imaging capabilities remain scarce (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1 | Chemical structures of dyes and the action mechanism of Hcy-ON for the synergistic photodynamic/MPTT of tumor.
To address the above issues, in this study, we utilized an acceptor engineering approach
to develop a series of near-infrared (NIR) activated dyes exhibiting AIE properties.
The introduction of diphenylamine into xanthene structures resulted in dyes with enhanced
AIE characteristics, PTT, PDT, and PAI potential, due to increased freely rotatable
single bonds and asymmetric structures. Interestingly, the variation in the number
of cyano groups in the dyes allowed for modulation of their excitation wavelengths,
PDT efficacy, and PTT capabilities. Experimental results revealed that
Experimental Methods
In this study, all reagents were obtained from commercial sources. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra of all compounds were detected by Bruker Avance II 400 spectrometers (Karlsruhe, Baden-Württemberg, Switzerland). Mass spectrometric [electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS)] data were obtained with Synapt G2-Si HDMS (Framingham, Massachusetts, United States). Atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry (APCI-MS) data were obtained with Agilent 6130 (Santa Clara, California, United States). The confocal laser scanning microscope images were obtained on an Olympus FV3000-IX81 confocal laser scanning microscope (Tokyo, Japan). Photothermal testing used an FLIR E6-XT infrared thermal camera (Wilsonville, Oregon, United States), and photoacoustic (PA) testing used an InVision 128 MSOT system (Munich, Bavaria, Germany). Apoptotic cells stained with Annexin V-FITC/PI were measured by flow cytometry BD Accuri C6 plus (Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, United States). In addition, the photothermal conversion efficiency (PCE) value (η) was calculated based on previous literature reports.35,36 For more dye characterization and experimental details, please refer to the Supporting Information. All the animal experiments involved in this study were conducted in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the US National Institutes of Health (8th edition, 2011), and approved by the Ethics Committee of Dalian University of Technology (Dalian, Liaoning Province, China).
Results and Discussion
Synthesis and spectral characterization
The changes in electron concentration of the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO)
have a more significant impact on the electron bandgap than the wide electron delocalization
of the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO), leading to a greater effect of the
electron-acceptor portion in dye molecules.37 Furthermore, the intense stretching vibration of cyano groups is less affected by
the external environment compared to intramolecular rotation, thereby favoring intramolecular
heat generation in aggregated states.38 Thus, by employing a tuning electron-acceptor engineering strategy for dyes, as shown
in Figure 1, electron-acceptor segments containing different numbers of cyano groups were incorporated
into molecules. This was achieved through a Knoevenagel condensation reaction to obtain
three donor-π-acceptor (D-π-A) structured analogs (namely
Figure 1 | Chemical structures and synthesis routes of dyes Hcy-OO, Hcy-ON, and Hcy-NN.
In general, using a π-bridge to connect an electron-donor (D) and an electron-acceptor
(A) to form a D-π-A structure can reduce the electronic energy level gap and promote
the intersystem crossing (ISC) process. This leads to a red shift in wavelength and
enhances the generation yield of ROS.39,40 Building on these insights, we initially investigated the photophysical properties
of these compounds in different solvents. Figure 2a–c and Supporting Information Figure S12 illustrate a noticeable red shift in both absorption and fluorescence emission peaks
from
Figure 2 | Absorption spectra of (a) Hcy-OO, (b) Hcy-ON, and (c) Hcy-NN in various solvents including 1,4-dioxane, THF, and dichloromethane at a concentration
of 10 μM. (d) Relative fluorescence intensities (I/I0) of the three molecules in mixed solutions (THF/PBS) at different volume ratios (fPBS: 0%–100%), where I0 and I are the peak fluorescence intensities of dyes in THF and in the THF/PBS mixed
solution, respectively. Different indicators were used to test the ROS generation
of 10 μM concentration of dye. (e) Fluorescence spectra of DCFH in the presence of
the three molecules and commercial probes, including RB, Ce6, and PBS. (f) Changes
in fluorescence intensity of the molecules at 525 nm. (g) Maximum HPF fluorescence
intensity at 515 nm, (h) minimum DPBF absorption value at 415 nm, and (i) maximum
DHR123 fluorescence at 525 nm.
To further evaluate the ROS generation capacity of the three dyes in solution, 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein
(DCFH) was used as an ROS fluorescence indicator. As shown in Figure 2e,f and Supporting Information Figure S13, the dyes exhibit different ROS generation capabilities, with
Photothermal and photoacoustic evaluation in solvents
The temperature changes of
Figure 3 | (a) PTI of Hcy-OO, Hcy-ON, and Hcy-NN at a concentration of 100 μM under 760 nm (800 mW/cm2) laser irradiation. (b) Photothermal temperature curves of Hcy-OO, Hcy-ON, and Hcy-NN at a concentration of 100 μM in solution under 760 nm (671 nm for Hcy-OO) laser irradiation (800 mW/cm2). (c) Temperature changes of Hcy-ON (100 μM) under 760 nm laser irradiation with varying optical power densities. (d) Photothermal
ability of Hcy-ON at different concentrations under 760 nm laser irradiation (800 mW/cm2). (e) PAI of three molecules at different concentrations in phantoms. (f) The linear
relationship between PA signal intensity and molecular concentration (n = 3).
Therefore, in the following analysis, we focused on assessing the photothermal efficiency
of
We incorporated diphenylamine into three dyes as an electron donor, along with multiple
freely rotatable single bonds, which facilitated the thermal conversion of the molecule.
The irregular conformations of these dyes increased the intermolecular distance. As
a result, intramolecular rotations can be retained even in the aggregated state with
loose intermolecular packing, thereby promoting heat generation in the aggregated
state.26 Moreover, we gradually substituted the carbonyl group of the molecules with electron-deficient
malononitrile as the electron acceptor, resulting in dyes ranging from
The nonradiative relaxation behavior of molecules upon reaching the excited state
provides molecules with both photothermal and PA properties. Building on the excellent
photothermal effect of
Theoretical calculation of ROS generation and photothermal performance
Density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT) calculations were
performed to investigate variations in ROS generation and photothermal performance
resulting from distinct photophysical properties of three dyes. As shown in Figure 4a, the donor and acceptor planes of
Figure 4 | (a) HOMO–LUMO distributions and energy levels of Hcy-OO, Hcy-ON, and Hcy-NN calculated using TD-DFT. (b) Comparisons of geometric configurations and RMSD values
(unit: Å) between optimized S0 (blue) and S1 (red) structures of three molecules. (c) Energy level diagram with main orbital contributions
calculated at the optimized S1 geometry using B3LYP/def2-SVP in Gaussian 16 and SOCME calculated using the ORCA
program. (d) Huang–Rhys factors of three dyes calculated using Gaussian 16.
Next, to investigate their photothermal potentials, we calculated the optimized S0 and S1 geometries of
We further studied the S–T energy gaps and electronic transition processes of the
three dyes using DFT calculations and a simplified Jablonski energy level diagram.
Additionally, we determined the spin–orbit coupling (SOC) rates with ORCA 5.0.4 to
explore the variations in photothermal properties and ROS generation ability of the
dyes. Notably, significant SOC was observed between the S1–T3 levels of
Cytotoxicity and ROS generation in vitro
Based on the results of testing three dye molecules in vitro,
As shown in Figure 5a–c,
Figure 5 | (a) MTT assay showing cell viability of MCF-7 cells after incubating with Hcy-OO, (b) Hcy-ON, or (c) Hcy-NN, following 24 h of light/dark exposure (n = 6). (d) Total ROS generation in MCF-7
cells after incubation with three molecules under light/dark conditions, detected
using DFCH-DA as an indicator (scale bars: 20 µm). (e) Calcein-AM (AM, green) and
PI (red) imaging of MCF-7 cells after different treatments (scale bars: 200 μm). (f) Annexin
V-FITC (green) and PI (red) imaging of MCF-7 cells after different treatments (scale
bars: 20 μm). (g) Measurement of MMPs in MCF-7 cells following different treatments,
using JC-1 as a fluorescent indicator (scale bars: 20 μm). Annexin V-FITC and PI cell
apoptosis detection of MCF-7 cells after treatment with: (h) 0 μg/mL Hcy-ON for 2 h, (i) 100 μg/mL Hcy-ON for 2 h, and (j) 100 μg/mL Hcy-ON for 2 h followed by exposure to the 760 nm laser (100 mW/cm2, 3 min, 18 J/cm2). The number of apoptotic cells stained with Annexin V-FITC/PI was quantified via
flow cytometry.
The ablation effect of
Study on the mechanism of Hcy-ON-induced cell death
After confirming the potent cytotoxicity of
It is noteworthy that the decrease in mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) is a
common feature of cell apoptosis.42 Therefore, we used the MMP-dependent probe JC-1 to further investigate the mode of
cell death. In healthy cells, the MMP is high, and JC-1 forms aggregates (JC-1 aggregates)
in the mitochondrial matrix, emitting red fluorescence under confocal microscopy.
When cells are damaged, the MMP depolarizes, resulting in a decrease in MMP. Consequently,
JC-1 is unable to aggregate and instead exists in its monomer form (JC-1 monomer),
which is associated with green fluorescence observed during confocal imaging. Using
carbonyl cyanide 3-chlorophenylhydrazine (CCCP) as a control, which serves as a mitochondrial
oxidative phosphorylation uncoupling agent, can alter the permeability of mitochondrial
inner membrane to H+, resulting in the loss of MMP. As shown in Figure 5g, confocal imaging of MCF-7 cells co-cultured with JC-1 revealed red fluorescence
in the control and
In vivo multimodal imaging and synergistic PTT/PDT
Compared to FLI, PAI offers superior penetration depth, addressing the limitations
of FLI in this aspect. Therefore, we used PAI to initially visualize tumor cells in
vitro. MCF-7 cells were incubated with varying concentrations of
Figure 6 | (a) PAI of MCF-7 cells incubated with different concentrations of Hcy-ON, and (b) corresponding PA signal intensity (n = 3). (c) PAI following intratumoral
injection of Hcy-ON in mice, along with (d) the intensity of the PA signal (n = 3). (e) PTI of mice after
intratumoral injection of Hcy-ON, performed using a photothermal camera under 760 nm laser irradiation with varying
light power densities. (f) Temperature changes within the tumor range. (g) Maximum
temperature during illumination.
After achieving promising initial results in vitro, driven by the efficient nonradiative
transition/IC of
After confirming the efficacy of
Figure 7 | (a) Schematic of the in vivo tumor synergistic treatment plan for PTT/PDT. (b) Tumor
images captured during the 14-day treatment period (n = 3). (c) Tumor images of all
groups following 14 days of treatment. (d) Changes in tumor volume and body weight
(e) of mice over time after various treatments (n = 3). (f) H&E, TUNEL, and Ki67 staining
of the tumors on day 14. Scale bars: 100 µm.
During the treatment period, the mice maintained stable weight, and no significant
mutations were observed (Figure 7e). Subsequently, we further evaluated the therapeutic effect of
Conclusions
Through the optimization of an electron-withdrawing engineering strategy, this study
introduced three new multifunctional dyes featuring AIE characteristics, namely
Supporting Information
Supporting Information is available and includes additional details on general methods, the experimental section, supporting figures ( Figures S1–S17).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.
Funding Information
This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant no. 2023YFB3810300), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 22078050, 22278061, 22378050, 22378051, and 22090011), the Science and Technology Plan Project of Liaoning Province (grant no. 2023JH2/101700296), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (grant nos. DUT24ZD117 and DUT24LAB105), and the Open Research Fund from the State Key Laboratory of Chemo/Biosensing and Chemometrics of Hunan University (grant no. 20240604). J.Y. thanks to the Nano & Material Technology Development Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by Ministry of Science and ICT (grant no. RS-2024-00407093) and the NRF for the grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (grant no. 2022R1A2C3005420).
References
- 1. Choi S. K.Photoactivation Strategies for Therapeutic Release in Nanodelivery Systems.Adv. Ther.2020, 3, 2000117. Google Scholar
- 2. Kim H.; Yang M.; Kwon N.; Cho M.; Han J.; Wang R.; Qi S.; Li H.; Nguyen V.-N.; Li X.; Cheng H.-B.; Yoon J.Recent Progress on Photodynamic Therapy and Photothermal Therapy.Bull. Korean Chem. Soc.2023, 44, 236–255. Crossref, Google Scholar
- 3. Li H.; Yao Q.; Sun W.; Shao K.; Lu Y.; Chung J.; Kim D.; Fan J.; Long S.; Du J.; Li Y.Aminopeptidase N Activatable Fluorescent Probe for Tracking Metastatic Cancer and Image-Guided Surgery via in Situ Spraying.J. Am. Chem. Soc.2020, 142, 6381–6389. Google Scholar
- 4. Feng X; Cao Y.; Zhuang P.; Cheng R.; Zhang X.; Liu H.; Wang G.; Sun S. K.Rational Synthesis of IR820–Albumin Complex for NIR-II Fluorescence Imaging-Guided Surgical Treatment of Tumors and Gastrointestinal Obstruction.RSC Adv.2022, 12, 12136–12144. Google Scholar
- 5. Zeng S.; Wang Y.; Chen C.; Kim H.; Liu X.; Jiang M.; Yu Y.; Kafuti Y. S.; Chen Q.; Wang J.; Peng X.An ER-Targeted, Viscosity-Sensitive Hemicyanine Dye for the Diagnosis of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver and Photodynamic Cancer Therapy by Activating Pyroptosis Pathway.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2024, 63, 202316487. Google Scholar
- 6. Li H.; Wang J.; Kim H.; Peng X.; Yoon J.Activatable Near-Infrared Versatile Fluorescent and Chemiluminescent Dyes Based on the Dicyanomethylene-4H-Pyran Scaffold: From Design to Imaging and Theranostics.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2024, 63, 202311764. Google Scholar
- 7. Roberts S.; Seeger M.; Jiang Y.; Mishra A.; Sigmund F.; Stelzl A.; Lauri A.; Symvoulidis P.; Rolbieski H.; Preller M.; Deán-Ben X. L.Calcium Sensor for Photoacoustic Imaging.J. Am. Chem. Soc.2018, 140, 2718–2721. Google Scholar
- 8. Jiang S.; Lin J.; Huang P.Nanomaterials for NIR-II Photoacoustic Imaging.Adv. Healthcare Mater.2023, 12, 2202208. Google Scholar
- 9. Zeng S.; Guo Z.; Hao Y.; Kafuti Y. S.; Yang Z.; Yao Q.; Wang J.; Peng X.; Li H.Tumor-Microenvironment-Activatable Organic Phototheranostic Agents for Cancer Therapy.Coord. Chem. Rev.2024, 509, 215786. Crossref, Google Scholar
- 10. Xu P.; Wen C.; Gao C.; Liu H.; Li Y.; Guo X.; Shen X. C.; Liang H.Near-Infrared-II-Activatable Self-Assembled Manganese Porphyrin-Gold Heterostructures for Photoacoustic Imaging-Guided Sonodynamic-Augmented Photothermal/Photodynamic Therapy.ACS Nano2024, 18, 713–727. Google Scholar
- 11. Castano A. P.; Mroz P.; Hamblin M. R.Photodynamic Therapy and Anti-Tumour Immunity.Nat. Rev. Cancer2006, 6, 535–545. Google Scholar
- 12. Fu Q.; Yu L.; Zhang M.; Li S.; Liu L.Engineering Nanosystems for ROS-Bridged Cancer Cascade Therapy.Chem. Eng. J.2023, 473, 145415. Google Scholar
- 13. Zeng S.; Chen C.; Zhang L.; Liu X.; Qian M.; Cui H.; Wang J.; Chen Q.; Peng X.Activation of Pyroptosis by Specific Organelle-Targeting Photodynamic Therapy to Amplify Immunogenic Cell Death for Anti-Tumor Immunotherapy.Bioact. Mater.2023, 25, 580–593. Google Scholar
- 14. Zeng S.; Liu X.; Kafuti Y. S.; Kim H.; Wang J.; Peng X.; Li H.; Yoon J.Fluorescent Dyes Based on Rhodamine Derivatives for Bioimaging and Therapeutics: Recent Progress, Challenges, and Prospects.Chem. Soc. Rev.2023, 52, 5607–5651. Crossref, Google Scholar
- 15. Li X.; Lovell J. F.; Yoon J.; Chen X.Clinical Development and Potential of Photothermal and Photodynamic Therapies for Cancer.Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol.2020, 17, 657–674. Google Scholar
- 16. Jiang Z.; Zhang C.; Wang X.; Yan M.; Ling Z.; Chen Y.; Liu Z.A Borondifluoride-Complex-Based Photothermal Agent with an 80% Photothermal Conversion Efficiency for Photothermal Therapy in the NIR-II Window.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2021, 60, 22376–22384. Google Scholar
- 17. Jung H. S.; Verwilst P.; Sharma A.; Shin J.; Sessler J. L.; Kim J. S.Organic Molecule-Based Photothermal Agents: An Expanding Photothermal Therapy Universe.Chem. Soc. Rev.2018, 47, 2280–2297. Google Scholar
- 18. Peng J.; Xiao Y.; Li W.; Yang Q.; Tan L.; Jia Y.; Qu Y.; Qian Z.Photosensitizer Micelles Together with IDO Inhibitor Enhance Cancer Photothermal Therapy and Immunotherapy.Adv. Sci.2018, 5, 1700891. Google Scholar
- 19. Liu H. J.; Wang M.; Hu X.; Shi S.; Xu P.Enhanced Photothermal Therapy Through the In-Situ Activation of a Temperature and Redox Dual-Sensitive Nanoreservoir of Triptolide.Small2020, 16, 2003398. Google Scholar
- 20. Wang Y.; Gong N.; Li Y.; Lu Q.; Wang X.; Li J.Atomic-Level Nanorings (A-NRs) Therapeutic Agent for Photoacoustic Imaging and Photothermal/Photodynamic Therapy of Cancer.J. Am. Chem. Soc.2020, 142, 1735–1739. Google Scholar
- 21. Liu X.; Su H.; Shi W.; Liu Y.; Sun Y.; Ge D.Functionalized Poly (pyrrole-3-carboxylic Acid) Nanoneedles for Dual-Imaging Guided PDT/PTT Combination Therapy.Biomaterials2018, 167, 177–190. Google Scholar
- 22. Wang W. X.; Chao J. J.; Wang Z. Q.; Liu T.; Mao G. J.; Yang B.; Li C. Y.Dual Key-Activated NIR-I/II Fluorescence Probe for Monitoring Photodynamic and Photothermal Synergistic Therapy Efficacy.Adv. Healthcare Mater.2023, 12, 2301230. Google Scholar
- 23. Shen H.; Wu B.; Zhang Q.; Ni J.; Liang M.; Liu Y.; Zang X. F.; Wang S.; Quan Y. Y.; Ye X.; Huang Z. S.Acceptor/π-Bridge Planarization and Donor Rotation Manipulation for Designing an NIR-II AIEgen with High Photothermal Conversion Efficiency to Enhance Cancer Phototherapy.Chem. Eng. J.2023, 468, 143726. Google Scholar
- 24. Cheng J.; Zhu Y.; Dai Y.; Li L.; Zhang M.; Jin D.; Liu M.; Yu J.; Yu W.; Su D.; Zou J.Gas-Mediated Tumor Energy Remodeling for Sensitizing Mild Photothermal Therapy.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2023, 62, 202304312. Google Scholar
- 25. Ma W.; Sun R.; Tang L.; Li Z.; Lin L.; Mai Z.; Chen G.; Yu Z.Bioactivable STING Nanoagonists to Synergize NIR-II Mild Photothermal Therapy Primed Robust and Long-Term Anticancer Immunity.Adv. Mater.2023, 35, 2303149. Google Scholar
- 26. Shu X.; Chen Y.; Yan P.; Xiang Y.; Shi Q. Y.; Yin T.; Wang P.; Liu L. H.; Shuai X.Biomimetic Nanoparticles for Effective Mild Temperature Photothermal Therapy and Multimodal Imaging.J. Control. Release2022, 347, 270–281. Google Scholar
- 27. Zhang W.; Wang M.; Liu B.; Yuan M.; Yang Z.; Tan J.; Lin J.Rational Design of Multi-Model ROS Regulation Nano-Platform for Enhanced Mild-Temperature Photothermal Therapy.Chem. Eng. J.2023, 460, 141818. Google Scholar
- 28. Zeng S.; Wang Z.; Chen C.; Liu X.; Wang Y.; Chen Q.; Wang J.; Li H.; Peng X.; Yoon J.Construction of Rhodamine-Based AIE Photosensitizer Hydrogel with Clinical Potential for Selective Ablation of Drug-Resistant Gram-Positive Bacteria in Vivo.Adv. Healthcare Mater.2022, 11, 2200837. Google Scholar
- 29. Wang W.; Gao Y.; Zhang M.; Li Y.; Tang B. Z.Neutrophil-Like Biomimic AIE Nanoparticles with High-Efficiency Inflammatory Cytokine Targeting Enable Precise Photothermal Therapy and Alleviation of Inflammation.ACS Nano2023, 17, 7394–7405. Google Scholar
- 30. Li H.; Yang M.; Kim J. S.; Ha J.; Han J.; Kim H.; Cho Y.; Wang J.; Nam K. T.; Yoon J.Structure-Oriented Design Strategy to Construct NIR AIEgens to Selectively Combat Gram (+) Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria in Vivo.Biomaterials2022, 286, 121580. Crossref, Google Scholar
- 31. Zhuang Z.; Li J.; Shen P.; Zhao Z.; Tang B. Z.Exploring and Leveraging Aggregation Effects on Reactive Oxygen Species Generation in Photodynamic Therapy.Aggregate2024, 5, 540. Google Scholar
- 32. Liu Z.; Zou H.; Zhao Z.; Zhang P.; Shan G. G.; Kwok R. T.; Lam J. W.; Zheng L.; Tang B. Z.Tuning Organelle Specificity and Photodynamic Therapy Efficiency by Molecular Function Design.ACS Nano2019, 13, 11283–11293. Google Scholar
- 33. Li H.; Lu Y.; Chung J.; Han J.; Kim H.; Yao Q.; Kim G.; Wu X.; Long S.; Peng X.; Yoon J.Activation of Apoptosis by Rationally Constructing NIR Amphiphilic AIEgens: Surmounting the Shackle of Mitochondrial Membrane Potential for Amplified Tumor Ablation.Chem. Sci.2021, 12, 10522–10531. Google Scholar
- 34. Li H.; Zhang L.; Han J.; Kim D.; Kim H.; Ha J.; Wang J.; Yoon J.Molecular Structural Evolution of Near-Infrared Cationic Aggregation-Induced Emission Luminogens: Preclinical Antimicrobial Pathogens Activities and Tissues Regeneration.CCS Chem.2022, 4, 487–500. Link, Google Scholar
- 35. Liu Y.; Ai K.; Liu J.; Deng M.; He Y.; Lu L.Dopamine-Melanin Colloidal Nanospheres: An Efficient Near-Infrared Photothermal Therapeutic Agent for in Vivo Cancer Therapy.Adv. Mater.2013, 25, 1353–1359. Google Scholar
- 36. Liu Y. Z.; Ran X. Y.; Zhou D. H.; Zhang H.; Chen Y. J.; Xu J. X.; Chen S. Y.; Kong Q. Q.; Yu X. Q.; Li K.Novel Dibenzofulvene-Based NIR-II Emission Phototheranostic Agent with an 82.6% Photothermal Conversion Efficiency for Photothermal Therapy.Adv. Funct. Mater.2023, 34, 2311365. Google Scholar
- 37. Ji A.; Lou H.; Qu C.; Lu W.; Hao Y.; Li J.; Wu Y.; Chang T.; Chen H.; Cheng Z.Acceptor Engineering for NIR-II Dyes with High Photochemical and Biomedical Performance.Nat. Commun.2022, 13, 3815. Google Scholar
- 38. Chen M.; Zhang X.; Liu J.; Liu F.; Zhang R.; Wei P.; Feng H.; Tu M.; Qin A.; Lam J. W.; Ding D.Evoking Photothermy by Capturing Intramolecular Bond Stretching Vibration-Induced Dark-State Energy.ACS Nano2020, 14, 4265–4275. Google Scholar
- 39. Dai W.; Bianconi T.; Ferraguzzi E.; Wu X.; Lei Y.; Shi J.; Tong B.; Carlotti B.; Cai Z.; Dong Y.Excited-State Modulation of Aggregation-Induced Emission Molecules for High-Efficiency Triplet Exciton Generation.ACS Mater. Lett.2021, 3, 1767–1777. Crossref, Google Scholar
- 40. Yan D.; Xie W.; Zhang J.; Wang L.; Wang D.; Tang B. Z.Donor/π-Bridge Manipulation for Constructing a Stable NIR-II Aggregation-Induced Emission Luminogen with Balanced Phototheranostic Performance.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2021, 60, 26769–26776. Google Scholar
- 41. Huang L.; Zhao S.; Wu J.; Yu L.; Singh N.; Yang K.; Lan M.; Wang P.; Kim J. S.Photodynamic Therapy for Hypoxic Tumors: Advances and Perspectives.Coord. Chem. Rev.2021, 438, 213888. Google Scholar
- 42. Zaib S.; Hayyat A.; Ali N.; Gul A.; Naveed M.; Khan I.Role of Mitochondrial Membrane Potential and Lactate Dehydrogenase A in Apoptosis.Anti-Cancer Agents Med. Chem.2022, 22, 2048–2062. Google Scholar