An Ultrastable, Easily Scalable and Regenerable Macrocycle-Based Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Framework
Crystalline porous materials are increasingly significant in synthetic and materials
chemistry. Nonetheless, their broad industrial deployment is hampered by challenges
in stability, production cost, scalability, and regenerability. Herein, we introduce
a one-pot synthetic methodology for fabricating macrocycle-based hydrogen-bonded organic
frameworks utilizing commercially available materials. Notably,
Introduction
In the preceding decades, crystalline porous materials, encompassing zeolites,1 metal–organic frameworks,2 and covalent organic frameworks,3 have revealed a multitude of potential applications in adsorption,4 separation,5 and catalysis.6 To evolve into a practical material, a crystalline porous substance typically needs to fulfill an array of additional prerequisites: cost-effectiveness, synthesis scalability, stability, processability, ease of manipulation, and application specificity.7–9 In recent years, hydrogen-bonded organic frameworks (HOFs), assembled via hydrogen bonds (H-bonds), have emerged as a pivotal subset within the realm of crystalline porous materials.10–12 They are distinguished by their inherent solution processability and regenerability.11,13 However, due to the considerably weaker nature of H-bonds in comparison to covalent and coordination bonds, the majority of HOFs tend to collapse upon the removal of solvent molecules or become damaged when subjected to harsh conditions.14 By opting for covalent organic macrocycles (COMs) as the building blocks for constructing macrocycle-based HOFs (mHOFs), wherein multiple urea,15 amide,16 α-hydroxyketone,17 carboxyl,18 and amine19 motifs interconnect ( Supporting Information Figure S1), these mHOFs showcase notable stability due to their intricate net of multiple H-bonding interactions. Notwithstanding, the synthesis of these COMs typically requires multiple steps and yields limited quantities, making them difficult to scale up for industrial applications. Therefore, there is a pressing need for a scalable one-pot synthesis of mHOFs using commercially available building blocks to accelerate the development of these materials.
Acylhydrazone bond is a type of N-substituted imine that possesses error-checking and self-correcting abilities, exhibiting
a high degree of stability.20–23 Acylhydrazones can be conveniently prepared in high yield through the condensation
of hydrazides and carbonyl compounds (aldehydes or ketones) under mild conditions
in the presence of Brønsted acids23 or metal templates (Figure 1a).24,25 The majority of reported acylhydrazone-linked COMs have been constructed from hydrazides
and aldehydes, demonstrating exceptional stability, even in water.26 In contrast, the formation and breakage of acylhydrazone bonds between hydrazides
and ketones require higher energy due to the larger steric hindrance and higher electron
density at the carbonyl carbon atom of ketones.23 Moreover, acylhydrazones, possessing donors (D) and acceptors (A), have a propensity
to undergo spontaneous self-assembly through intermolecular H-bonds (N–H⋯O) between
the amide units.27,28 Apart from the Z and E configurations in the C=N bond,29 the C–N bond in the amide unit has a partial double-bond character, affording two
potential conformational isomers, namely anti and syn modes, in the acylhydrazone bond.30 In the anti mode, they typically connect through a single H-bond (Figure 1b), whereas in the syn mode, they can assemble via double H-bonds (Figure 1c). Despite being uncommon in the literature, the syn mode undeniably plays a pivotal role in crafting a stable semirigid macrocycle that
incorporates acylhydrazone bonds.31 We hypothesize that enhancing the rigidity of the macrocycle can effectively constrain
the acylhydrazone bond into a specific conformation, thereby promoting spontaneous
aggregation through hydrogen bonding interaction. Additionally, the presence of methyl
groups in acylhydrazones derived from ketones may serve as a protective shield against
nucleophilic attacks, thus augmenting their stability. Accordingly, the synthesis
of acylhydrazone-linked macrocycles with increased rigidity holds significant promise
in the construction of stable mHOFs, given the facile availability of ketones and
hydrazides.
Figure 1 | (a) Synthesis of acylhydrazones via condensation reactions between hydrazides and
aldehydes (or ketones). The amide units in the acylhydrazone bonds could undergo anti-syn isomerization. (b) Single N–H⋯O hydrogen-bond between acylhydrazones in anti mode.
(c) Double N–H⋯O hydrogen-bonds between acylhydrazones in syn mode.
Herein, we report the discovery of a facile, one-pot, catalyst-free, high-yielding,
gram-scale synthesis of a crystalline porous
Experimental Methods
Chemicals and materials
2,6-Diacetylpyridine (
Method
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were recorded on Bruker spectrometers (Avance III 600 or Avance III 500) (Bruker, Karlsruhe, German). High resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometry measurements were performed on a Bruker ultraflex MALDI TOF mass spectrometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, German). The Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) spectra were determined using a Bruker EQUINOX 55 spectrometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, German). UV–vis-NIR absorption spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu UV-3600 spectrophotometer (SHIMADZU, Tokyo, Japan). Water contact angles were measured using a KRUSS DSA100 contact angle meter (KRÜSS, Hamburg, German). Raman spectra were recorded on a Renishaw inVia laser micro-Raman spectrometer (Renishaw, London, England). The conductivity of seawater was obtained by a METTLER TOLEDO DDSJ-319L electric conductometer (Mettler-Toledo International Inc., Greifensee, Switzerland). Digital photographs were obtained by a Nikon Y-TV55 camera (Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was carried out on a NETZSCH TG209 system (NETZSCH, Shanghai, China). Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) analysis was performed on a Thermo Fisher Scientific iCAP Q instrument (ThermoFisher Scientific, Shanghai, China). The single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SCXRD) data were collected at Beamline 17B of Advanced Light Source at Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (Shanghai, China) or using a Bruker D8 VENTURE PHOTON II MetalJet (Bruker, Karlsruhe, German). Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) measurements were recorded on a Bruker D8 powder X-ray diffractometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, German) with Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were recorded using a SU8010 ultrahigh revolution field emission scanning electron microscope (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). Elemental distribution was examined by thermal field emission environmental energy dispersive spectroscopy (Quanta 400F; ThermoFisher Scientific, Shanghai, China). All cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) experiments were performed on a ThermoFisher Scientific Titan Krios G3i electron microscope (ThermoFisher Scientific, Shanghai, China) operated at 300 kV. N2 adsorption measurements were carried out using an ASAP 2460 system (Micromeritics, Shanghai, China). Water vapor adsorption measurements were investigated on a Quantachrome instrument (Quantachrome, Florida, USA).
Synthesis of mHOF-SYSU101
Density functional theory calculations
All density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed by using the Vienna Ab-initio Simulation Package.32 The detailed DFT methods are provided in the Supporting Information.
Results and Discussion
Synthesis and characterization of mHOF-SYSU101
Figure 2 | (a) Two synthetic routes for mHOF-SYSU101. In the structure of 2-Mn, the axially coordinated solvent molecules are omitted for clarity. (b) MALDI-TOF
MS spectra of mHOF-SYSU101. (c) 1H NMR spectra of mHOF-SYSU101 (600 MHz, CF3COOD, 298 K). (d) An optical image of the single crystals of mHOF-SYSU101 obtained by Method 2.
Considering the phenomenon of self-healing observed in the SEM results, as well as
the reported stimuliresponsive dynamic covalent bonds implicated in the conversion
between discrete organic cages and polymers,34–36 our research efforts were directed towards manipulating the crystallization process
and impeding the reaction kinetics to obtain suitable crystals for SCXRD. Specifically,
we aimed to retard the reaction rate and modify the crystallization process by disassembling
the original macrocycles, an endeavor that entails cleaving the pre-existing bonds
and thus decelerating the reaction. The framework of
Single crystal analysis of mHOF-SYSU101
Using synchrotron radiation X-ray diffraction, the single-crystal structure of
Figure 3 | (a) Crystal structure of a discrete [2 + 2] macrocycle in mHOF-SYSU101. The dotted black line represents the intramolecular C–H⋯N hydrogen bonds. Color
codes: C, gray; N, blue; O, red; H, light green. (b) Electrostatic potential map of
the [2 + 2] macrocycle. (c) Four ADD-DDA hydrogen-bonded arrays formed between four
adjacent macrocycles. The dotted black line represents the intermolecular N–H⋯O and
C–H⋯O hydrogen bonds. (d) The 2D supramolecular layer in the bc plane. (e) The offset π–π stacking interaction with a distance of 3.95 Å between
the layers. (f) The framework with 1D channels along the a axis.
Phase purity, porosity, and stability of mHOF-SYSU101
The PXRD patterns of bulk powder
Figure 4 | (a) PXRD patterns of the as-synthesized and simulated mHOF-SYSU101. (b) Variable temperature PXRD patterns of mHOF-SYSU101 in the range of 30–400 °C under N2 atmosphere. (c) N2 sorption isotherms at 77 K for mHOF-SYSU101. Inset, pore size distribution derived from N2 adsorption curve. PXRD patterns (d) and residue weight percentage (e) of mHOF-SYSU101 after treatment for 7 days in different solvents. (f) Partial temperature-dependent
FT-IR spectra of mHOF-SYSU101 in the range of 30–200 °C. (g) Photograph of gram-scale synthesized mHOF-SYSU101 obtained by Method 1.
To investigate the chemical stability of
Analysis of ADD-DDA hydrogen-bonded array
C–H⋯O bond has garnered significant attention due to its pivotal role in biological structures,41 molecular recognition,42 and supramolecular chemistry,43 and it also plays an important part in our hydrogen-bonded framework. Despite the well-known challenge of experimentally detecting this weak interaction,44–46 we successfully identified the C–H⋯O interactions via variable temperature FT-IR. As shown in Figure 4f, two stretching vibration bands of the methyl groups were observed at 3176 and 3072 cm−1 at 30 °C, respectively. Upon increasing the temperature from 30 to 200 °C, the peak at 3176 cm−1 showed an obvious blueshift to 3186 cm−1 and reduction in intensity, providing compelling evidence for the existence of C–H⋯O bonds.47 In contrast, both of the N–H stretching band at 3280 cm−1 and the C=O stretching band at 1668 cm−1 exhibited a slight decrease in intensity at 200 °C ( Supporting Information Figure S20), indicating the presence of strong hydrogen-bonding interactions between the amide groups.48
To further evaluate the C–H⋯O and N–H⋯O interactions in
Investigations on the formation mechanism of mHOF-SYSU101
To investigate the formation mechanism of
Based on the above results, we propose a plausible mechanism of the formation of
Scalable synthesis of mHOF-SYSU101
It is worth noting that the price of
Rapid regeneration of mHOF-SYSU101
Noncovalent interactions endow HOFs materials with solution processability and regenerability.11,13,53 Furthermore, strategies employing reversible solid-solution-solid transformations
enhance the castability and recyclability of these materials, thereby overcoming a
substantial barrier impeding their practical application. Typically, most reported
HOFs materials can be regenerated via a dissolution-recrystallization process in common
solvents such as DMSO, NMP, and DMF. However, this approach is not viable for
Figure 5 | (a) Schematic illustration of the rapid regeneration process of mHOF-SYSU101. (b) SEM image of the regenerated mHOF-SYSU101. (c) Energy changes in the process of regenerating mHOF-SYSU101. (d) Structural profile of the regenerated mHOF-SYSU101 by low-electron-dose cryo-EM. Inset, the fast Fourier transform pattern of the selected
area highlighted in the red frame. (e) The amplified cryo-EM structures of the selected
areas highlighted in the red and blue frames in (d).
Low-electron-dose cryo-EM is a powerful tool for observing the atomic-scale structure
of crystalline porous materials.54 However, visualizing the microstructure of HOFs materials using this method remains
challenging.55 On the one hand, the crystal sizes of HOFs reported in the literature usually reach
the micrometer scale, which make them difficult for electron beam to penetrate the
crystals. On the other hand, noncovalently linked porous HOFs materials are sensitive
to electron beam. Therefore, visualization of the microstructure of HOFs materials
always encounters rapid amorphization of the target voxel.56 Benefiting from its ultrastability and nanometer size, we successfully visualized
the crystallographic structure of the regenerated
Guided by these mechanistic insights, we tested replacing DMSO with low-cost methanol
as the Lewis base responsible for extracting protons from the protonated macrocycles.
Upon introducing a TFA solution of
Iodine adsorption
131I2 and 129I2 are common radioactive species in nuclear waste and accidents, and effectively removing
these radioactive iodine compounds from nuclear waste is paramount for both human
well-being and the preservation of the ecological environment. Until now, the endeavor
to develop practical porous iodine adsorption materials for the nuclear power industry,
which must concurrently possess the ability to seamlessly absorb iodine, provide high
adsorption efficiency, maintain exceptional thermal stability, and enable reversible,
reproducible regeneration, has remained a crucial and formidable undertaking.58,59
Figure 6 | (a) Comparison of Raman spectra of mHOF-SYSU101 and I2@ mHOF-SYSU101. (b) Time-dependent UV/vis absorption spectra of a seawater solution of iodine (90 ppm)
upon addition of mHOF-SYSU101. (c) The iodine adsorption removal efficiency is based on the absorption peak at
286 nm. (d) Recycling performance of mHOF-SYSU101 in five cycles of iodine adsorption experiments.
Furthermore, the preferred adsorption configuration of I2 in
In a practical assessment, a seawater solution of iodine (ca. 90 ppm, see Supporting Information Figures S43) was used to test the ability of
Conclusion
In summary, we have synthesized a macrocycle-based hydrogen-bonded organic framework
Supporting Information
Supporting Information is available and includes materials, methods, experimental procedures for synthesis and characterization, X-ray crystallographic data, details on the DFT calculations, and Iodine adsorption experiment. The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center (CCDC) deposition number (CCDC 2302841-2302843, 2314406) contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper.
Conflict of Interest
The authors disclose competing financial interests as follows: A patent application in China (Application No. 2023114292004) related to the manuscript’s content is currently under review. The research presented herein may have implications for the commercial exploitation of this patent. Furthermore, the approval of this patent could yield potential economic benefits to the authors.
Funding Information
We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 21272285, 22090061, and 3100041031094) and Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (grant nos. 2021A1515010132 and 2022A1515010051). Single-crystal structure characterization was supported by the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility. Computational resources were provided by the National Supercomputer Center in Guangzhou.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Prof. Dr. Zong-Wan Mao, Prof. Dr. Zheng-Ping Qiao, Prof. Dr. Feng Zeng, and Dr. Long Jiang in Sun Yat-sen University for their supports and valuable suggestions.
References
- 1. Li Y.; Yu J.New Stories of Zeolite Structures: Their Descriptions, Determinations, Predictions, and Evaluations.Chem. Rev.2014, 114, 7268–7316. Google Scholar
- 2. Furukawa H.; Cordova K. E.; O’Keeffe M.; Yaghi O. M.The Chemistry and Applications of Metal-Organic Frameworks.Science2013, 341, 1230444. Google Scholar
- 3. Waller P. J.; Gándara F.; Yaghi O. M.Chemistry of Covalent Organic Frameworks.Acc. Chem. Res.2015, 48, 3053–3063. Google Scholar
- 4. Han X.; Yang S.; Schröder M.Porous Metal-Organic Frameworks as Emerging Sorbents for Clean Air.Nat. Rev. Chem.2019, 3, 108–118. Google Scholar
- 5. Zhou D.-D.; Chen P.; Wang C.; Wang S.-S.; Du Y.; Yan H.; Ye Z.-M.; He C.-T.; Huang R.-K.; Mo Z.-W.; Huang N.-Y.; Zhang J.-P.Intermediate-Sized Molecular Sieving of Styrene from Larger and Smaller Analogues.Nat. Mater.2019, 18, 994–998. Google Scholar
- 6. Daliran S.; Oveisi A. R.; Peng Y.; López-Magano A.; Khajeh M.; Mas-Ballesté R.; Alemán J.; Luque R.; Garcia H.Metal-Organic Framework (MOF)-, Covalent-Organic Framework (COF)-, and Porous-Organic Polymers (POP)-Catalyzed Selective C–H Bond Activation and Functionalization Reactions.Chem. Soc. Rev.2022, 51, 7810–7882. Google Scholar
- 7. Slater A. G.; Cooper A. I.Function-Led Design of New Porous Materials.Science2015, 348, aaa8075. Google Scholar
- 8. Grazia Bezzu C.; Burt L. A.; McMonagle C. J.; Moggach S. A.; Kariuki B. M.; Allan D. R.; Warren M.; McKeown N. B.Highly Stable Fullerene-Based Porous Molecular Crystals with Open Metal Sites.Nat. Mater.2019, 18, 740–745. Google Scholar
- 9. Little M. A.; Cooper A. I.The Chemistry of Porous Organic Molecular Materials.Adv. Funct. Mater.2020, 30, 1909842. Google Scholar
- 10. Yuan Z.; Jiang X.; Chen L.; Chen J.; Li L.; Yang Y.; Li Y.; Xiang F.; Xiang S.; Chen B.; Zhang Z.Sticked-Layer Strategy to a Flexible-Robust Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Framework for Efficient C2H2/CO2 Separation.CCS Chem.2024, 6, 663–671. Link, Google Scholar
- 11. Liu B.-T.; Gong S.-H.; Jiang X.-T.; Zhang Y.; Wang R.; Chen Z.; Zhang S.; Kirlikovali K. O.; Liu T.-F.; Farha O. K.; Cao R.A Solution Processible Single-Crystal Porous Organic Polymer.Nat. Synth.2023, 2, 873–879. Google Scholar
- 12. Song X.; Wang Y.; Wang C.; Wang D.; Zhuang G.; Kirlikovali K. O.; Li P.; Farha O. K.Design Rules of Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Frameworks with High Chemical and Thermal Stabilities.J. Am. Chem. Soc.2022, 144, 10663–10687. Crossref, Google Scholar
- 13. Feng S.; Shang Y.; Wang Z.; Kang Z.; Wang R.; Jiang J.; Fan L.; Fan W.; Liu Z.; Kong G.; Feng Y.; Hu S.; Guo H.; Sun D.Fabrication of a Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Framework Membrane through Solution Processing for Pressure-Regulated Gas Separation.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2020, 59, 3840–3845. Google Scholar
- 14. Lin R.-B.; He Y.; Li P.; Wang H.; Zhou W.; Chen B.Multifunctional Porous Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Framework Materials.Chem. Soc. Rev.2019, 48, 1362–1389. Google Scholar
- 15. Wu X.; Wang P.; Turner P.; Lewis W.; Catal O.; Thomas D. S.; Gale P. A.Tetraurea Macrocycles: Aggregation-Driven Binding of Chloride in Aqueous Solutions.Chem2019, 5, 1210–1222. Google Scholar
- 16. Picini F.; Schneider S.; Gavat O.; Jentzsch A. V.; Tan J.; Maaloum M.; Strub J.-M.; Tokunaga S.; Lehn J.-M.; Moulin E.; Giuseppone N.Supramolecular Polymerization of Triarylamine-Based Macrocycles into Electroactive Nanotubes.J. Am. Chem. Soc.2021, 143, 6498–6504. Google Scholar
- 17. Wang Y.-T.; McHale C.; Wang X.; Chang C.-K.; Chuang Y.-C.; Kaveevivitchai W.; Miljanić O. Š.; Chen T.-H.Cyclotetrabenzoin Acetate: A Macrocyclic Porous Molecular Crystal for CO2 Separations by Pressure Swing Adsorption.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2021, 60, 14931–14937. Google Scholar
- 18. Hisaki I.; Xin C.; Takahashi K.; Nakamura T.Designing Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Frameworks (HOFs) with Permanent Porosity.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2019, 58, 11160–11170. Google Scholar
- 19. Chaix A.; Mouchaham G.; Shkurenko A.; Hoang P.; Moosa B.; Bhatt P. M.; Adil K.; Salama K. N.; Eddaoudi M.; Khashab N. M.Trianglamine-Based Supramolecular Organic Framework with Permanent Intrinsic Porosity and Tunable Selectivity.J. Am. Chem. Soc.2018, 140, 14571–14575. Google Scholar
- 20. Furlan R. L. E.; Ng Y.-F.; Otto S. J.; Sanders K. M.A New Cyclic Pseudopeptide Receptor for Li+ from a Dynamic Combinatorial Library.J. Am. Chem. Soc.2001, 123, 8876–8877. Google Scholar
- 21. Lin Z.; Emge T. J.; Warmuth R.Multicomponent Assembly of Cavitand-Based Polyacylhydrazone Nanocapsules.Chem. Eur. J.2011, 17, 9395–9405. Google Scholar
- 22. Cougnon F. B. L.; Caprice K.; Pupier M.; Bauzá A.; Frontera A.A Strategy to Synthesize Molecular Knots and Links Using the Hydrophobic Effect.J. Am. Chem. Soc.2018, 140, 12442–12450. Google Scholar
- 23. Jiao T.; Wu G.; Zhang Y.; Shen L.; Lei Y.; Wang C.-Y.; Fahrenbach A. C.; Li H.Self-Assembly in Water with N-Substituted Imines.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2020, 59, 18350–18367. Google Scholar
- 24. Giri C.; Topić F.; Cametti M.; Rissanen K.Mixed Valence Mono- and Hetero-Metallic Grid Catenanes.Chem. Sci.2015, 6, 5712–5718. Google Scholar
- 25. Li Z.-W.; Wang X.; Wei L.-Q.; Ivanović-Burmazović I.; Liu G.-F.Subcomponent Self-Assembly of Covalent Metallacycles Templated by Catalytically Active Seven-Coordinate Transition Metal Centers.J. Am. Chem. Soc.2020, 142, 7283–7288. Google Scholar
- 26. Li H.; Zhang H.; Lammer A. D.; Wang M.; Li X.; Lynch V. M.; Sessler J. L.Quantitative Self-Assembly of a Purely Organic Three-Dimensional Catenane in Water.Nat. Chem.2015, 7, 1003–1008. Google Scholar
- 27. Wang Y.; Lovrak M.; Liu Q.; Maity C.; Le Sage V. A. A; Guo X.; Eelkema R.; Van Esch J. H.Hierarchically Compartmentalized Supramolecular Gels Through Multilevel Self-Sorting.J. Am. Chem. Soc.2019, 141, 2847–2851. Google Scholar
- 28. Deng Y., Zhang Q., Shi C., Toyoda R., Qu D.-H., Tian H., Feringa B. L.Acylhydrazine-Based Reticular Hydrogen Bonds Enable Robust, Tough, and Dynamic Supramolecular Materials.Sci. Adv.2022, 8, eabk3286. Google Scholar
- 29. Van Dijken D. J.; Kovaříček P.; Ihrig S. P.; Hecht S.Acylhydrazones as Widely Tunable Photoswitches.J. Am. Chem. Soc.2015, 137, 14982–14991. Google Scholar
- 30. Mazur L.; Jarzembska K. N.; Kamiński R.; Woźniak K.; Pindelska E.; Zielińska-Pisklak M.Substituent and Solvent Effects on Intermolecular Interactions in Crystals of N-Acylhydrazone Derivatives: Single-Crystal X-Ray, Solid-State NMR, and Computational Studies.Cryst. Growth Des.2014, 14, 2263–2281. Google Scholar
- 31. Blanco-Gómez A.; Fernández-Blanco Á.; Blanco V.; Rodríguez J.; Peinador C.; García M. D.Thinking Outside the “Blue Box”: Induced Fit within a Unique Self-Assembled Polycationic Cyclophane.J. Am. Chem. Soc.2019, 141, 3959–3964. Google Scholar
- 32. Kresse G.; Furthmüller J.Efficiency of Ab-Initio Total Energy Calculations for Metals and Semiconductors Using a Plane-Wave Basis Set.Comput. Mater. Sci.1996, 6, 15–50. Google Scholar
- 33. Wu Y.; Mao X.; Zhang M.; Zhao X.; Xue R.; Di S.; Huang W.; Wang L.; Li Y.; Li Y.2D Molecular Sheets of Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Frameworks for Ultrastable Sodium-Ion Storage.Adv. Mater.2021, 33, 2106079. Google Scholar
- 34. Shan Z.; Wu X.; Xu B.; Hong Y.; Wu M.; Wang Y.; Nishiyama Y.; Zhu J.; Horike S.; Kitagawa S.; Zhang G.Dynamic Transformation Between Covalent Organic Frameworks and Discrete Organic Cages.J. Am. Chem. Soc.2020, 142, 21279–21284. Google Scholar
- 35. Liu C.; Jin Y.; Yu Z.; Gong L.; Wang H.; Yu B.; Zhang W.; Jiang J.Transformation of Porous Organic Cages and Covalent Organic Frameworks with Efficient Iodine Vapor Capture Performance.J. Am. Chem. Soc.2022, 144, 12390–12399. Crossref, Google Scholar
- 36. Zhu Q.-H.; Zhang G.-H.; Zhang L.; Wang S.-L.; Fu J.; Wang Y.-H.; Ma L.-J.; He L.; Tao G.-H.Solvent-Responsive Reversible and Controllable Conversion Between a Polyimine Membrane and an Organic Molecule Cage.J. Am. Chem. Soc.2023, 145, 6177–6183. Google Scholar
- 37. Desiraju G. R.Supramolecular Synthons in Crystal Engineering—A New Organic Synthesis.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.1995, 34, 2311–2327. Google Scholar
- 38. Yang L.; Tan X.; Wang Z.; Zhang X.Supramolecular Polymers: Historical Development, Preparation, Characterization, and Functions.Chem. Rev.2015, 115, 7196–7239. Google Scholar
- 39. Hou L.; Shan C.; Song Y.; Chen S.; Wojtas L.; Ma S.; Sun Q.; Zhang L.Highly Stable Single Crystals of Three-Dimensional Porous Oligomer Frameworks Synthesized Under Kinetic Conditions.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2021, 60, 14664–14670. Google Scholar
- 40. Xu H.; Gao J.; Jiang D.-L.Stable, Crystalline, Porous, Covalent Organic Frameworks as a Platform for Chiral Organocatalysts.Nat. Chem.2015, 7, 905–912. Google Scholar
- 41. Horowitz S.; Trievel R. C.Carbon-Oxygen Hydrogen Bonding in Biological Structure and Function.J. Biol. Chem.2012, 287, 41576–41582. Google Scholar
- 42. Lee S.; Chen C.-H.; Flood A. H.A Pentagonal Cyanostar Macrocycle with Cyanostilbene CH Donors Binds Anions and Forms Dialkylphosphate [3]Rotaxanes.Nat. Chem.2013, 5, 704–710. Google Scholar
- 43. Chen L.; Yuan Z.; Zhang H.; Ye Y.; Yang Y.; Xiang F.; Cai K.; Xiang S.; Chen B.; Zhang Z.A Flexible Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Framework Constructed from a Tetrabenzaldehyde with a Carbazole N−H Binding Site for the Highly Selective Recognition and Separation of Acetone.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2022, 61, e202213959. Google Scholar
- 44. Desiraju G. R.The C–H⋯O Hydrogen Bond: Structural Implications and Supramolecular Design.Acc. Chem. Res.1996, 29, 441–449. Google Scholar
- 45. Pullanchery S.; Kulik S.; Rehl B.; Hassanali A.; Roke S.Charge Transfer Across C–H⋯O Hydrogen Bonds Stabilizes Oil Droplets in Water.Science2021, 374, 1366–1370. Google Scholar
- 46. Loveday O.; Echeverria J.Methyl Groups as Widespread Lewis Bases in Noncovalent Interactions.Nat. Commun.2021, 12, 5030. Google Scholar
- 47. Matsuura H.; Yoshida H.; Hieda M.; Yamanaka S.-y.; Harada T.; Shin-ya K.; Ohno K.Experimental Evidence for Intramolecular Blue-Shifting C–H⋯O Hydrogen Bonding by Matrix-Isolation Infrared Spectroscopy.J. Am. Chem. Soc.2003, 125, 13910–13911. Google Scholar
- 48. Lugger S. J. D.; Mulder D. J.; Schenning A. P. H. J.One-Pot Synthesis of Melt-Processable Supramolecular Soft Actuators.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2022, 61, e202115166. Google Scholar
- 49. Spackman M. A.; Jayatilaka D.Hirshfeld Surface Analysis.CrystEngComm2009, 11, 19–32. Google Scholar
- 50. Kokan Z.; Chmielewski M. J.A Photoswitchable Heteroditopic Ion-Pair Receptor.J. Am. Chem. Soc.2018, 140, 16010–16014. Google Scholar
- 51. Beaudoin D.; Rominger F.; Mastalerz M.Chirality-Assisted Synthesis of a Very Large Octameric Hydrogen-Bonded Capsule.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2016, 55, 15599–15603. Google Scholar
- 52. Nowak P.; Colomb-Delsuc M.; Otto S.; Li J.Template-Triggered Emergence of a Self-Replicator from a Dynamic Combinatorial Library.J. Am. Chem. Soc.2015, 137, 10965–10969. Google Scholar
- 53. Wang Y.; Cao R.; Wang C.; Song X.; Wang R.; Liu J.; Zhang M.; Huang J.; You T.; Zhang Y.; Yan D.; Han W.; Yan L.; Xiao J.; Li P.In Situ Embedding Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Frameworks Nanocrystals in Electrospinning Nanofibers for Ultrastable Broad-Spectrum Antibacterial Activity.Adv. Funct. Mater.2023, 33, 2214388. Google Scholar
- 54. Lyu Z.; Yao L.; Chen W.; Kalutantirige F. C.; Chen Q.Electron Microscopy Studies of Soft Nanomaterials.Chem. Rev.2023, 123, 4051–4145. Google Scholar
- 55. Chen G.; Huang S.; Shen Y.; Kou X.; Ma X.; Huang S.; Tong Q.; Ma K.; Chen W.; Wang P.; Shen J.; Zhu F.; Ouyang G.Protein-Directed, Hydrogen-Bonded Biohybrid Framework.Chem2021, 7, 2722–2742. Google Scholar
- 56. Li Y.; Huang W.; Li Y.; Chiu W.; Cui Y.Opportunities for Cryogenic Electron Microscopy in Materials Science and Nanoscience.ACS Nano2020, 14, 9263–9276. Google Scholar
- 57. Wang L.; Zeng C.; Xu H.; Yin P.; Chen D.; Deng J.; Li M.; Zheng N.; Gu C.; Ma Y.A Highly Soluble, Crystalline Covalent Organic Framework Compatible with Device Implementation.Chem. Sci.2019, 10, 1023–1028. Google Scholar
- 58. Xie W.; Cui D.; Zhang S.-R.; Xu Y.-H.; Jiang D.-L.Iodine Capture in Porous Organic Polymers and Metal–Organic Frameworks Materials.Mater. Horiz.2019, 6, 1571–1595. Google Scholar
- 59. He L.; Chen L.; Dong X.; Zhang S.; Zhang M.; Da X.; Liu X.; Lin P.; Li K.; Chen C.; Pan T.; Ma F.; Chen J.; Yuan M.; Zhang Y.; Chen L.; Zhou R.; Han Y.; Chai Z.; Wang S.A Nitrogen-Rich Covalent Organic Framework for Simultaneous Dynamic Capture of Iodine and Methyl Iodide.Chem2021, 7, 699–714. Google Scholar
- 60. Lin Y.; Jiang X.; Kim S. T.; Alahakoon S. B.; Hou X.; Zhang Z.; Thompson C. M.; Smaldone R. A.; Ke C.An Elastic Hydrogen-Bonded Cross-Linked Organic Framework for Effective Iodine Capture in Water.J. Am. Chem. Soc.2017, 139, 7172–7175. Google Scholar